Research prompts that preserve evidence.
The goal is not a confident answer. It is a useful chain from source → claim → uncertainty → implication.
Source comparison
Compare sources without flattening disagreements
Compare the sources below.
For each source extract:
- publication date,
- population / scope,
- methodology or evidence type,
- key factual claims,
- limitations,
- conflicts with other sources.
Then produce:
1. facts supported by multiple sources,
2. claims supported by only one source,
3. unresolved disagreements,
4. what additional evidence would resolve them.
Do not merge conflicting claims into a false consensus.
SOURCES:
[PASTE SOURCES]
Market research
Build a market snapshot
Create a market snapshot for [MARKET / PRODUCT].
Use only the supplied sources.
Separate:
- market facts,
- customer problems,
- competitor positioning,
- pricing evidence,
- adoption signals,
- risks / unknowns.
For every factual statement, preserve the source.
Flag stale data and unsupported assumptions.
End with 5 questions we still cannot answer confidently.
Fact check
Stress-test a claim
Evaluate this claim: [CLAIM]
Return:
1. what would count as evidence for it,
2. strongest supporting evidence provided,
3. strongest contradicting evidence provided,
4. missing context or definitions,
5. confidence level with reasons,
6. what source would be most useful to verify next.
Do not treat repetition across websites as independent confirmation.